The Critical Moves team previews 2026’s most anticipated strategy releases after 2025’s disappointing output, examining everything from grand-scale RTS spiritual successors and Warhammer 40K’s dual strategy offerings to ambitious space sims and indie passion projects—balancing excitement with cautious reservations about scope creep, limited launch rosters, and missing features like fleet combat.
https://criticalmovespodcast.com/listen
This episode provides comprehensive 2026 strategy gaming previews through host selections revealing their priorities and concerns. Al champions Sanctuary Shattered Sun as Supreme Commander’s spiritual successor alongside Dawn of War 4’s return to franchise roots and Total War Warhammer 40K’s galactic ambitions tempered by fleet combat absence. Sid explores space strategy’s indie ecosystem through Falling Frontier’s physics-based combat, Fragile Existence’s survival mechanics, and Beyond Astra’s grand strategy societal simulation. Jack highlights Heroes of Might and Magic Olden Era’s demo success, Stronghold: The Dark Ages’ mysterious development, and Atre Dominance Wars’ surgical genre blending. The conversation examines recurring concerns about indie scope creep versus AAA limited launch content, the Warhammer 40K strategy competition, and whether 2026 finally delivers what 2025 promised.
Critical Moves Podcast – Episode 63 Show Notes
Episode Title: 2026 Strategy Gaming Preview: Cautious Optimism After 2025
Hosts: Jack, Al, Sid
Episode Length: ~71 minutes
Episode Summary
The sixty-third episode previews 2026’s strategy gaming landscape after 2025’s quality disappointments, with hosts selecting their most anticipated releases while maintaining measured expectations. Al’s selections—Sanctuary Shattered Sun, Dawn of War 4, and Total War Warhammer 40K—reveal Warhammer 40K enthusiasm tempered by concerns about King Art Games’ limited RTS pedigree, Creative Assembly’s restricted faction roster, and conspicuous fleet combat absence from Total War’s galactic scope. Sid’s space strategy focus showcases indie ambition through Falling Frontier’s extended delays, Fragile Existence’s solo developer challenges, and Beyond Astra’s grand strategy aspirations competing against Stellaris dominance. Jack’s picks spanning Heroes of Might and Magic Olden Era’s demo momentum, Stronghold: The Dark Ages’ minimal information, and Atri Dominance Wars’ surgical genre fusion complete the preview. The discussion examines whether indie developers risk scope creep attempting too much versus AAA publishers launching with insufficient content, debates Warhammer 40K’s dual strategy releases potentially competing or synergizing, and questions if 2026 finally provides the quality 2025 failed delivering.
Introduction and 2025 Context
Disappointing Year Sets 2026 Stage
Jack opens acknowledging 2025’s impressive release volume across strategy gaming failed meeting quality expectations despite quantity. Major franchise returns including Civilization and Europa Universalis disappointed alongside numerous other titles requiring significant post-launch improvement reaching acceptable standards. The previous episode’s retrospective revealed hosts selecting DLCs and existing titles over new 2025 releases as their year’s favourites—damning commentary on new game quality.
This context frames 2026 previews with cautious optimism rather than uncritical enthusiasm. The team learned from anticipating 2025’s releases only to encounter widespread disappointment, creating measured expectations for upcoming titles despite exciting announcements and promising gameplay footage. The conversation balances genuine excitement for certain projects with realistic assessment of development challenges, publisher track records, and indie studio limitations.
Al’s Picks: Sanctuary Shattered Sun and Warhammer 40K Dominance
Sanctuary Shattered Sun
Supreme Commander’s Spiritual Successor
Al leads with Sanctuary Shattered Sun despite acknowledging complete bias as the project’s community manager—a position he secured through passion for Supreme Commander’s grand-scale RTS gameplay. The game’s Dyson sphere setting enables environmental destruction mechanics where superweapons create holes in the map with water, units, and buildings falling into the sun below, surpassing even Planetary Annihilation’s planet destruction scope.
Chris Taylor’s endorsement as Supreme Commander and Total Annihilation’s spiritual successor carries significant weight. The 18-year gap since Supreme Commander’s release demonstrates niche large-scale RTS appeal and development challenges, making Sanctuary Shattered Sun’s emergence notable for reviving grand tactical combat missing from modern RTS landscape. The game’s tier system now extends to tier five titans functioning as “game enders”—single units capable of decimating entire bases and forcing match conclusions.
2026 Release Expectations
The March-July 2026 window targets Kickstarter campaign launch and first public demo release, making the game playable in 2026 regardless of full release timing. Al hopes for early access launch before year’s end, acknowledging indie developers benefit from early access revenue and community feedback during extended development. The pre-alpha playable state already demonstrates core mechanics function, though substantial work remains before commercial launch.
Al’s personal playtesting experience validates his enthusiasm—describing the initial load comparable to first experiencing Supreme Commander in 2007, blown away by gargantuan scale translating from tiny tier one scouts through tier five titans. The strategic zoom system returns enabling godlike battlefield perspective distinguishing Supreme Commander from conventional RTS titles, combined with enhanced destruction mechanics promising scale and spectacle defining the original’s appeal.
Patreon Early Access
Current Patreon supporters can request keys for immediate access to pre-alpha builds, enabling community participation during development while generating funding supporting continued work. This approach builds engaged community providing feedback before wider release while rewarding early financial supporters with exclusive play opportunities. The transparency around development state—openly acknowledging pre-alpha status—sets realistic expectations rather than overpromising polished experiences.
Dawn of War 4
Return to Franchise Roots
Al’s second selection addresses Warhammer 40K RTS through King Art Games’ Dawn of War 4 development, announced shortly after Relic’s Definitive Edition release created perfect storm of 40K RTS enthusiasm. The developers explicitly target original Dawn of War’s classic RTS gameplay rather than Dawn of War II’s departure or Dawn of War 3’s failed innovations, acknowledging community preference for the franchise-defining first entry’s mechanics.
Games Workshop and Deep Silver’s partnership with King Art Games rather than Relic suggests the latter’s struggles with Dawn of War II’s controversial changes and Dawn of War 3’s commercial failure influenced publisher decisions. King Art’s transparent commitment to franchise roots addresses fan concerns upfront, promising return to beloved mechanics rather than risky experimentation alienating dedicated audiences.
King Art Games Reservations
Al maintains reservations about King Art Games’ limited RTS pedigree—their sole genre entry being Iron Harvest, a moderate quality title clearly influenced by Relic’s Company of Heroes through cover systems and tactical mechanics. This thin track record creates uncertainty whether they can deliver Dawn of War 4 matching or exceeding the original’s quality, particularly given Relic’s established expertise creating that beloved foundation.
However, King Art’s exceptional transparency through persistent development updates, frequent videos, regular articles, and ongoing interviews demonstrates commitment to community engagement. This communication strategy contrasts sharply with developers announcing titles then disappearing for months without updates, building goodwill through accessible information sharing about progress, challenges, and design decisions.
2026 Competition Concerns
Dawn of War 4’s 2026 release coincides with Total War Warhammer 40K, creating direct competition between strategy games sharing the 40K universe where players command Space Marine squads against Orks. Tim’s optimism suggests the titles might synergize—Total War players discovering Dawn of War and vice versa through shared IP interest—but Al recognizes potential cannibalization of limited strategy gaming audiences.
The competition dynamic creates interesting market test for whether Warhammer 40K’s popularity supports multiple simultaneous strategy releases or whether titles compete for same player pools. Dawn of War’s traditional RTS focus versus Total War’s grand strategy scope provides differentiation, but both target 40K enthusiasts wanting tactical Space Marine command experiences.
Total War: Warhammer 40K
Galactic Scale Ambitions
Total War Warhammer 40K represents Al’s dream project—combining beloved Total War mechanics with Warhammer 40K’s galactic Imperium setting. Creative Assembly’s successful Warhammer Fantasy trilogy proved the formula works, validating expectations that 40K’s larger, more popular IP justifies confident full-featured launch rather than cautious limited release testing market viability.
The four-tier system addresses galactic scale concerns: individual battles occur planetside, planets exist within solar system “flashpoints” serving as campaign theatres, and these systems populate the galaxy map. This hierarchical structure prevents seamless transitions from galactic overview to individual battlefields but provides comprehensible navigation between strategic and tactical scales. Campaign variety spans quick single-battle scenarios completable in an hour, medium campaigns finished in an evening, and grand campaigns requiring weekend commitment.
Critical Fleet Combat Absence
Al’s primary criticism centres on apparent fleet combat absence despite galactic warfare fundamentally requiring space battles. Everything indicates player-controlled fleet engagements won’t feature despite fleets being able to “battle each other”—suggesting automated resolution rather than tactical control. Battlefleet Gothic Armada demonstrated viable 40K space RTS combat in 2009, proving market appetite and technical feasibility.
Creative Assembly developed entirely new engine for this game (also powering Medieval 3), making technical limitations implausible excuses for omitting fleet mechanics. The conspicuous silence around space battles in promotional materials suggests intentional exclusion rather than delayed reveal—if confident showing this feature, it would have appeared in trailers. This omission fundamentally undermines the galactic warfare setting where fleets represent crucial strategic assets with storied histories and civilizations living aboard millennia-old battleships.
Limited Launch Roster Concerns
Four playable factions at launch (Space Marines, Imperial Guard/Astra Militarum, Eldar, Orks) seems insufficient for Total War game and particularly inadequate given 40K’s breadth compared to Warhammer Fantasy. The 2016 original Warhammer Total War launched with four races (Empire, Dwarves, Greenskins, Vampire Counts), but Warhammer Fantasy represents significantly smaller setting than the galaxy-spanning Imperium of Man.
Creative Assembly’s proven Warhammer formula success across three titles and 40K’s substantially larger, more popular IP compared to Fantasy suggests launching with only four factions represents copout rather than cautious market testing. Two factions belong to the Imperium (Space Marines and Imperial Guard), effectively providing three distinct sides rather than four truly different forces. The promised eventual faction additions through DLC signals heavy post-launch monetization approach potentially overwhelming players with constant releases.
Chaos Space Marines and DLC Concerns
Chaos Space Marines’ launch absence despite being fundamental 40K antagonists enables extensive DLC fragmentation—individual Chaos god factions (Khorne, Nurgle, Tzeentch, Slaanesh), specific traitor legions (Black Legion, Alpha Legion), and countless other variations easily generating 10-15 separate DLC releases before exploring other factions. This DLC-heavy approach proven through Warhammer Fantasy’s extensive post-launch content raises concerns about overwhelming monetization overshadowing base game quality.
The competition with Dawn of War 4 creates interesting dynamic where both titles target similar audiences simultaneously. Jack’s optimism suggests Dawn of War 4 releases first half 2026 while Total War 40K launches late 2026, potentially minimizing direct competition. Dawn of War’s historically limited DLC approach versus Total War’s extensive post-launch support model creates different value propositions—complete experience at launch versus evolving game requiring ongoing purchases.
New Engine and Console Launch Risks
Total War 40K represents Creative Assembly’s first simultaneous PC and console release on entirely new engine, combining multiple risk factors historically problematic for the developer. Rome 2’s disastrous launch occurred during their last new engine debut, creating precedent for catastrophic technical problems when introducing fundamental technology changes. The console optimization requirements potentially compromise PC experience or create feature limitations accommodating controller interfaces.
These concerns temper Al’s enthusiasm despite perfect IP combination and proven formula foundation. The cautious optimism acknowledges exciting potential while recognizing substantial risks around technical execution, feature completeness, and monetization approaches. Pre-alpha gameplay footage appearing in promotional materials suggests significant development work remains before achieving commercial release quality.
Sid’s Space Strategy Focus
Falling Frontier
Physics-Based Logistics Emphasis
Sid champions Falling Frontier for prioritizing logistics, supply lines, reconnaissance, and intelligence over raw firepower—reflecting realistic military operations where strategic preparation determines tactical success more than unit counts. The physics-based ship combat creates grounded battles where subsystem damage, crew management, and projectile behaviour follow consistent rules rather than arbitrary game mechanics, appealing to simulation enthusiasts wanting authentic space warfare.
Procedurally generated star systems promise billions of potential battlefields with varied tactical challenges, though quality versus quantity concerns emerge around whether algorithmic generation provides strategic depth and balance matching carefully designed scenarios. The three-layer AI system (general, tactical, individual unit) represents significant technical challenge requiring each level function competently for strategic decisions translating into effective tactical execution.
Aesthetic Excellence and Grime Mechanics
The game’s distinctive visual design features ships accumulating grime and dirt over time—potentially purely aesthetic or incorporating gameplay mechanics affecting performance. This attention to visual authenticity creates lived-in universe feel where vessels show operational wear rather than pristine showroom condition. The art style and aesthetic consistently impress across promotional materials, suggesting talented team capable of realizing ambitious vision.
Development Hell Concerns
Al raises critical questions about Falling Frontier’s viability given delays in 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025, with 2026 representing fifth consecutive postponement. The November 2023 Steam announcement delaying until 2025 followed by next update announcing 2026 delay suggests communication gaps and persistent development challenges. While indie studios legitimately struggle with limited funding extending development timelines, the pattern indicates potential development hell where the game never reaches commercially viable completion.
Recent developer updates confirm continued active development rather than project abandonment, detailing combat system revamps, ship design overhauls, and improved physics grounding. The transformation from original arcade approach to current simulation focus explains some delay—fundamental mechanical changes require extensive iteration and testing. However, the pattern of scope expansion rather than completion focus raises questions whether Falling Frontier releases in 2026 or faces further postponement.
Jack’s Optimism About Talent
Jack offers alternative development hell interpretation—rather than lacking talent causing perpetual struggle achieving goals, Falling Frontier suffers from excess talent pulling off ambitious work encouraging scope expansion. The gorgeous promotional materials appearing “almost fake” in their quality suggests highly capable team executing impressive visual and mechanical systems, potentially fuelling ambition beyond initial project boundaries.
This interpretation frames delays as successful execution enabling expanded vision rather than struggling inadequacy, though the practical result remains identical—persistent delays without commercial launch. The team’s capability creating stunning presentations doesn’t guarantee understanding business management, community expectation handling, or realistic project scoping—different skill sets from technical development excellence.
Fragile Existence
Hybrid Survival RTS/4X
Sid’s second selection combines RTS, 4X, and survival strategy mechanics through Battlestar Galactica-inspired refugee fleet management fleeing destroyed Earth while establishing planetary colonies and surviving overwhelming alien threats. Solo developer Lee Harris based in UK attempts ambitious genre fusion creating human-centric survival narrative emphasizing desperation and rebuilding through macro strategy and hands-on fleet management.
The procedurally generated universe enables varied scenarios while promising extensive modding tools and scenario editors creating potentially endless player-created content extending longevity beyond developer-produced campaigns. This modding focus acknowledges community creativity often surpasses official content production, providing framework for sustained engagement through player contributions.
Solo Developer Scope Concerns
Al questions whether solo developer attempts too much combining RTS, 4X, and survival mechanics across both planetary and space-based gameplay. The ambitious scope rivals team-developed projects, raising feasibility concerns about single person managing all design, programming, art, and production aspects across multiple interconnected complex systems. Recent development diary mentions finalizing core city-building mechanics both planetside and in space, suggesting major gameplay systems near completion.
The narrative-driven approach using procedurally generated galaxies creates tension between authored storytelling and emergent sandbox experiences. Understanding how core storylines function within algorithmically generated universes remains unclear—whether players follow predetermined narrative arcs or create emergent stories through procedural systems. This ambiguity reflects communication challenges around explaining complex interconnected mechanics without overwhelming audiences.
Invitation for Developer Interview
Al extends interview invitation to Lee Harris, leveraging UK proximity for potential conversation about Fragile Existence’s development, design philosophy, and solo developer challenges. The tongue-in-cheek “pop down the road” reference acknowledges Critical Moves’ UK contingent including Al and Sid, though Jack jokes about London Village implying tiny island where everyone lives adjacently.
Beyond Astra
Grand Strategy Societal Simulation
Sid’s final space selection emphasizes grand strategy elements differentiating Beyond Astra from Falling Frontier and Fragile Existence’s more action-focused approaches. The “personal space opera generator” description promises deep societal simulation where citizens matter individually, cultural development shapes civilizations, and diplomatic, scientific, and religious systems create complex emergent narratives beyond military conquest focus.
The Unreal Engine foundation worries Sid given that engine’s poor optimization reputation, though acknowledging many successful Unreal games exist despite community concerns. The self-published Nebu Games development suggests indie studio maintaining creative control without publisher interference potentially compromising vision, though also lacking major publisher resources supporting marketing, QA, and technical optimization.
Stellaris Competition
The grand strategy space 4X combination inevitably invites Stellaris comparisons—Paradox’s dominant title maintaining massive audiences despite inability creating compelling sequel. Beyond Astra’s comprehensive sandbox with “near infinite possibilities” through procedurally generated living galaxies directly challenges Stellaris’ throne, requiring exceptional execution matching or exceeding that established game’s depth and replayability.
Al questions how Beyond Astra integrates grand strategy elements into 4X framework, noting grand strategy typically involves inheriting established empires with existing histories while 4X games start from single settlement building empires from scratch. This mechanical distinction creates fundamental design tension around whether Beyond Astra truly represents grand strategy or constitutes ambitious 4X with enhanced systems.
Ambition Versus Execution Risks
The game promises RTS space battles, planetary city building, 4X exploration and expansion, and grand strategy societal management—hybrid of multiple genres creating concerns about attempting too much. Sid acknowledges extensive mechanical variety risks imbalanced implementation where certain aspects receive insufficient development attention. Successful execution could produce genuine Stellaris competitor, but failure risks disappointing experiences across all attempted genres rather than excelling in focused scope.
Al’s observation about indie developers attempting too much applies equally to Beyond Astra—the comprehensive feature list sounds impressive on paper but raises feasibility questions about whether small team adequately implements all promised systems. The comparison to Falling Frontier’s focused vision despite extended delays versus Beyond Astra and Fragile Existence’s broader ambitions highlights scope management as critical indie success factor.
Jack’s Selections: Fantasy Returns and Mysterious Developments
Heroes of Might and Magic: Olden Era
Demo Success and First Impressions
Jack’s Heroes of Might and Magic Olden Era selection stems from positive Steam NextFest demo experience despite being series newcomer. The demo became one of most-played across all genres during the festival, demonstrating substantial audience interest and successful introduction to turn-based fantasy strategy. Jack appreciated the stylized fantasy aesthetic, turn-based combat engagement, and siege mechanics despite finding latter somewhat confusing initially.
The tutorial missions effectively onboarded new players through gradual mechanic introduction before removing hand-holding, allowing independent exploration of taught systems. However, tutorial limitations created difficulty spikes where insufficiently explained mechanics disadvantaged players against enemies perfectly knowing map layouts and player positions regardless of scouting. AI resource generation beyond town production capacities and massive difficulty bonuses replacing genuine intelligence frustrated players expecting fair competition.
AI and Balance Issues Requiring Attention
Sid highlights community feedback about AI problems including omniscient map knowledge calculating player army strength perfectly despite hidden positions, generating resources and units beyond town capabilities, and relying on massive bonuses at higher difficulties rather than smarter decision-making. These balance issues require addressing before full release to prevent frustrating experiences where AI cheats rather than challenges through superior strategy.
The mobile graphics complaints Al references reflect visual simplification enabling potential tablet/phone ports, though graphical quality remains subjective. The game looks gorgeous but employs design language suggesting touch interface compatibility—potentially limiting visual complexity accommodating mobile platforms alongside PC release.
Confident 2026 Release Expectations
Jack expresses strong confidence in 2026 release given demo completeness suggesting near-final product already exists. The tutorial missions represent polished slice of full experience, implying substantial content exists beyond demonstrated portions. Future DLC and updates will expand the base game, but current state appears commercially viable requiring primarily balance adjustments and AI improvements rather than fundamental system additions.
Stronghold: The Dark Ages
Minimal Information Available
Jack’s Stronghold: The Dark Ages selection acknowledges extremely limited information beyond Firefly Studios confirming new franchise entry planned for 2026 and “The Dark Ages” trademark filing still under review. The absence of official announcements, gameplay footage, or detailed information prevents substantive discussion beyond speculation about potential directions based on franchise history.
The two well-received Stronghold 1 and 2 remasters generated community goodwill potentially supporting new entry despite previous mainline release problems. The series’ historical focus and castle-building emphasis provide foundation for Dark Ages setting exploration, though whether this represents return to original gameplay style or continues experimental directions remains unknown.
Unreal Engine Transition Concerns
Community concerns about Unreal Engine adoption question whether Firefly abandons the isometric 2D/3D hybrid perspective defining earlier entries for full 3D implementation. The engine change potentially enables enhanced graphics and modern features but risks losing distinctive visual style characterizing the series. Previous transitions between Stronghold 1 and 2 created aesthetic debates and gameplay preference divisions among fans.
Jack’s personal preference for Stronghold 2’s arcadey gameplay over the original’s different approach reflects subjective taste potentially unpopular with hardcore series fans. His anticipation for new entry stems from childhood Stronghold 2 experiences alongside Age of Empires 2 and Age of Mythology, creating nostalgic attachment driving interest despite information scarcity.
Atre Dominance Wars
Surgical Genre Blending
Jack’s final selection highlights Atre Dominance Wars’ precise combination of real-time fantasy strategy, god game mechanics, and Heroes of Might and Magic elements without appearing overly ambitious. Developer Ironward Studios’ previous Red Solstice 1 and 2 science fiction strategy games demonstrate genre competency, with fantasy pivot representing calculated expansion into new setting rather than inexperienced experimentation.
The game’s gorgeous presentation rivals or exceeds Endless Legend 2 while incorporating Heroes of Might and Magic mechanical influences through surgical extraction of specific appealing elements rather than wholesale genre mashup. Jack perceives deliberate design choices selecting complementary systems serving cohesive gameplay vision, contrasting with other discussed titles attempting comprehensive feature lists potentially creating imbalanced implementations.
Kickstarter Success and Development Status
The November 2025 Kickstarter campaign obliterated its $30,000 target, demonstrating substantial community interest and securing funding supporting continued development. The delay into 2026 citing both content additions and optimization work suggests incomplete state requiring further development beyond polish, though stretch goal implementation from successful Kickstarter adds content obligations beyond original scope.
Al identifies Heroes of Might and Magic similarities explaining his personal hesitation given his dislike for that series, though acknowledging Atre’s distinctive qualities potentially differentiating it sufficiently appealing to different audiences. The developer’s transparency about development state and communication through Kickstarter updates builds community trust through realistic expectation setting.
Confident Core Existence
Jack’s assessment suggests sufficient game exists that 2026 release without Kickstarter stretch goals would produce compelling experience. The foundational mechanics appear implemented and functional based on available information, with additional development refining existing systems and adding stretch goal content rather than building core gameplay from scratch. This positions Atre favourably compared to titles where fundamental systems remain uncertain or clearly incomplete.
Star Wars Zero Company: The Absent Pick
Announcement Without Follow-Through
Al expresses disappointment Jack didn’t include Star Wars Zero Company despite high placement on Al’s anticipation list. The April 2025 announcement explicitly warned against expecting updates for extended period, creating information vacuum preventing substantive preview discussion. The CG trailer ending with brief alpha gameplay footage suggests very early development stage requiring years before commercial release.
Jack explains his Star Wars disinterest combined with insufficient new information justifies exclusion—without concrete details beyond initial announcement, discussion devolves into baseless speculation rather than informed preview. The squad-based tactical strategy genre appeals regardless of license, and Firaxis Games’ XCOM pedigree provides confidence in execution competency, but lack of substantial reveals prevents meaningful analysis.
XCOM in Star Wars Universe
The “Star Wars XCOM” positioning leverages Firaxis’ genre-defining tactical game against popular IP, potentially creating Game Awards-worthy squad-based strategy bridging accessibility and depth. Star Wars properties historically generate massive audience reactions when executed well, as demonstrated by highly anticipated releases receiving enthusiastic reception at recent Game Awards despite franchise fatigue in other media.
The comparison to Casey Hudson’s announced third-person action RPG suggests both titles received premature announcements very early in development cycles. Showing some gameplay footage in Zero Company’s trailer exceeds purely CG reveals, but the alpha state implies years of development remain before commercial viability. Hopefully 2026 brings substantial updates enabling proper preview discussion, though realistic expectations suggest longer timelines.
Closing Thoughts
Cautious Optimism Theme
The episode balances genuine excitement for upcoming releases with measured expectations learned from 2025’s disappointments. Recurring concerns about indie scope creep attempting too much versus AAA limited launch content creating different disappointment risks frame the discussion. The hosts’ selections reveal personal priorities—Al’s Warhammer 40K enthusiasm, Sid’s space strategy focus, Jack’s fantasy preference—while acknowledging shared reservations about development challenges.
The conversation’s critical tone toward anticipated games reflects Critical Moves’ commitment to honest assessment rather than uncritical hype. Al’s acknowledgment that discussing flaws indicates deeper investment in these titles’ success demonstrates how criticism stems from care rather than negativity. The team wants these games succeeding, making honest evaluation of potential problems service to both developers and audiences.
2026 Potential
Despite reservations, 2026’s lineup substantially exceeds 2025’s quality based on announced titles, proven developer track records, and demonstrated gameplay. The year potentially delivers what 2025 promised but failed providing—compelling new strategy experiences across RTS, grand strategy, 4X, and hybrid genres. Whether indie ambitions prove achievable and AAA publishers adequately support launches with sufficient content and features remains uncertain, but possibilities justify cautious optimism.
Contact & Links
About | Contact | Meet the Team | Get Involved | Forum | Episodes
Discord | Reddit | Twitter / X | Facebook
Instagram | Twitch | Steam Group | Steam Curator
YouTube | Spotify | Apple | Amazon
Email: [email protected]
Episode Verdict
This preview reveals 2026’s strategy gaming potential while maintaining realistic expectations after 2025’s widespread disappointments. The hosts’ selections spanning Supreme Commander spiritual successors, dual Warhammer 40K strategy releases, ambitious space sims, and fantasy returns demonstrate genre diversity and innovation attempts, though recurring concerns about indie scope creep versus AAA limited launch content create different risk profiles threatening different disappointment types. Al’s fleet combat criticism of Total War 40K exemplifies how even dream projects can miss fundamental features, while Falling Frontier’s five consecutive delays illustrate indie development challenges potentially preventing commercial viability regardless of talent. The cautious optimism threading the discussion acknowledges exciting announcements and promising footage while remembering 2025’s lessons about overhyping unreleased games. If even half these titles deliver on their promises without catastrophic technical problems or design failures, 2026 substantially improves over its predecessor—though whether developers meet community expectations or repeat 2025’s pattern of requiring extensive post-launch fixes to reach acceptable quality remains the crucial unanswered question.
Next Episode: What to play if you only have 300 hours in 2026.
Discover more from Critical Moves Podcast
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.