Al, Joe, Nuno, and Drexy break down the newly revealed Total War: Warhammer 40,000, covering its brand-new Warscore engine, four launch factions built for maximum asymmetry, a galactic-scale campaign map with a notable absence of ship-to-ship combat, and lingering questions about whether the tactical battle system might pull the series toward Company of Heroes territory.
https://criticalmovespodcast.com/listen
This episode dives deep into Total War: Warhammer 40,000 following its PC Gaming Show reveal trailer and developer gameplay walkthrough. The hosts confirm the game runs on Creative Assembly’s new Warscore engine, shared with the upcoming Medieval 3, and examine the four confirmed launch factions—Space Marines, Astra Militarum, Aeldari, and Orks—each designed to play in fundamentally different ways. The conversation covers the multi-layered galactic campaign structure spanning solar systems and randomized planets, frustration over the apparent absence of ship-to-ship combat despite series precedent in Empire: Total War, and extended speculation about how tactical battles will handle cover, destructible terrain, objective capture, and reinforcement phases. The episode closes with cautious optimism tempered by memories of Rome II’s rocky new-engine launch and concerns about console day-one availability affecting UI complexity.
Critical Moves Podcast – Episode 85 Show Notes
Episode Title: Total War: Warhammer 40,000 Breakdown
Hosts: Al, Joe, Nuno, Drexy
Episode Length: ~54 minutes
Episode Summary
Episode 85 brings the full team together, including Nuno’s continued return and newcomer Drexy’s second appearance, to dissect the newly revealed Total War: Warhammer 40,000. The hosts watch and react to the reveal trailer together, confirm details about the game’s new Warscore engine, and spend the bulk of the episode speculating on faction design, the galactic-scale campaign structure, the conspicuous absence of ship-to-ship combat, and how tactical battles might handle cover, objectives, and reinforcement phases. The conversation weighs genuine excitement against specific concerns, informed by the troubled launch history of both Rome II and Total War: Warhammer III.
Personal 40K Histories
Each host shares their relationship with Warhammer 40K before diving into the game itself. Nuno describes enjoying digital adaptations like Battle Sector and Space Marine despite never playing tabletop, while Drexy reveals surprising tabletop experience, including painting miniatures, and a preference for 40K’s Space Hulk games over Warhammer Fantasy titles. Al and Joe both discuss discovering 40K in their teenage years, with Joe noting a stronger personal preference for the fantasy side of the franchise and its Greenskin lore, while Al has been a dedicated 40K fan since around age 13.
Watching the Reveal Trailer Together
The hosts watch the newly released teaser trailer live during recording, centered on the planet Armageddon and featuring the character Commissar Yarrick. Al explains the significant lore connection to Warhammer 40K’s newly released 11th tabletop edition, also themed around Armageddon, suggesting deliberate cross-promotional marketing between the tabletop and video game releases.
The New Engine Confirmation
Following some confusion and cross-checking mid-recording, the hosts confirm that Total War: Warhammer 40,000 is built on Warscore, a genuinely new engine also powering the upcoming Medieval 3, rather than a modified version of Creative Assembly’s existing engine. Nuno initially expressed skepticism based on prior reporting suggesting a heavily modified existing engine, but revises his outlook positively upon confirmation, citing improved terrain destruction capabilities as a meaningful upgrade.
Four Launch Factions and Asymmetric Design
Drexy highlights an unexplained reserve system tied to a command limit visible in gameplay footage, suggesting different factions will field dramatically different unit caps and army compositions. The confirmed launch factions—Space Marines, Astra Militarum, Aeldari, and Orks—are promised to play in fundamentally distinct ways, with Space Marines fielding small elite forces, Orks bringing overwhelming numbers, and Aeldari specializing in hit-and-run tactics. The hosts draw parallels to Total War: Warhammer’s own launch roster and subsequent faction-specific campaign design, which many consider one of that series’ strongest achievements.
DLC Potential and Space Marine Chapters
The team extensively discusses whether Space Marines will be represented as a single unified faction or eventually split into individual chapters (Blood Angels, Dark Angels, Space Wolves, etc.) through DLC, similar to how Total War: Warhammer expanded its roster over time. Al expresses cautious optimism that chapter-specific DLC will include meaningful mechanical differences rather than purely cosmetic changes, citing the newly announced army painter mechanic as evidence supporting deeper customization. Nuno and Al both suggest launching with only four factions may partly reflect Creative Assembly needing to rebuild trust and revenue following Warhammer III’s rocky performance, drawing comparison to Total War: Warhammer II’s similarly sized four-faction launch, which remains one of the series’ most beloved entries.
The Galactic Campaign Map Structure
The hosts examine the game’s multi-layered campaign map, spanning a galactic overview, individual solar systems, and multiple planets per system, each supporting several distinct battlefields. Al expresses initial disappointment that the game won’t offer seamless zoom transitions similar to Stellaris, but notes Creative Assembly has explained this layered structure is intentional, designed to allow players to complete a full campaign within a single evening rather than requiring the sprawling scale of a true 4X galaxy conquest.
The Missing Ship-to-Ship Combat
Al voices significant frustration over the apparent complete absence of ship-to-ship naval combat, despite the series’ strong precedent with Empire: Total War’s acclaimed naval battles and the existence of a dedicated Warhammer 40K tabletop system, Battlefleet Gothic, covering void combat. Nuno offers a possible explanation: integrating full naval combat could create unpredictable interactions with ground combat outcomes, and the added complexity may have been cut to meet release pressure following Warhammer III’s underperformance and the resulting need to generate revenue faster.
Randomized Campaign Structure
Nuno highlights an unexpected positive: the ability to randomize planets and solar systems within campaigns, offering significantly more replayability than he initially anticipated when the game was first announced, addressing earlier concerns that the entire game might take place on a single static planet.
Tactical Combat Speculation
The hosts extensively speculate on how ranged-combat-focused battles will function differently from Total War’s traditionally melee-centric systems. Al highlights confirmed features including a planet-type system (hive worlds, agri worlds, mining worlds, frontier worlds) generating distinct battlefield environments with verticality, destructible buildings enabled by the new engine, and tooltip-confirmed cover bonuses. Nuno predicts an objective-based capture system based on visual analysis of the trailer, drawing a contrast with Rome II’s poorly received and thematically awkward objective-capture mechanics, while noting 40K’s combination of bombardment threats and ranged weaponry makes traditional pitched battles less central than in historical Total War titles.
Dynamic Cover and Multi-Phase Battles
Nuno expresses hope for Company of Heroes-style dynamic cover, including destructible cover objects and terrain-dependent bonuses, along with a possible multi-phase reinforcement system similar to Steel Division, where units enter combat in staged waves rather than all at once, potentially solving concerns about army scale feeling underwhelming with limited unit caps.
Is Total War Becoming an RTS?
Al raises concern that leaning too heavily into Company of Heroes-style tactical mechanics could come at the expense of the campaign-layer strategy he personally values most in Total War games, questioning whether resources poured into flashy tactical battle showcases might shortchange deeper campaign design. Nuno pushes back, arguing Total War has always functioned more as a tactics game than a pure grand strategy title, and that borrowing proven mechanics from Company of Heroes represents a positive evolution rather than genre drift. Joe shares Al’s concern, expressing hope that the campaign layer remains substantial rather than serving merely as a setup for RTS-style engagements, particularly given the parallel existence of Dawn of War 4 already serving that tactical-battle-focused niche.
Immortal Empires Speculation
Asked whether an “Immortal Empires” style unified campaign mode (as introduced for Total War: Warhammer) might eventually arrive for the 40K series, Nuno predicts this feature is more likely to accompany a sequel than launch alongside the base game, given the complexity of merging separate campaign timelines.
Console Day-One Release and UI Concerns
Late in the episode, Al raises a previously unaddressed concern: Total War: Warhammer 40,000 will release simultaneously on console and PC for the first time in series history, a departure that Al worries could result in simplified, “dumbed down” UI design to accommodate controller-based play.
Tempering Expectations: The Rome II Precedent
Al reminds the group that Rome II, the last Total War title to launch on a brand-new engine, suffered a notoriously troubled release, tempering his enthusiasm about Warscore despite genuine excitement about its capabilities.
Contact & Links
About | Contact | Meet the Team | Get Involved | Forum | Episodes
Discord | Reddit | Twitter / X | Facebook
Instagram | Twitch | Steam Group | Steam Curator
YouTube | Spotify | Apple | Amazon
Email: [email protected]
Episode Verdict
This episode succeeds through genuine collaborative speculation rather than confident predictions, with hosts actively cross-referencing trailer footage, correcting each other’s assumptions about the engine in real time, and openly disagreeing about what the tactical combat direction means for the series’ identity. Al’s tempered enthusiasm, consistently returning to specific unresolved concerns like ship combat and console UI compromises, provides useful counterweight to Nuno and Joe’s growing excitement following the engine confirmation. The extended tactical combat speculation segment, while necessarily uncertain given available information, demonstrates the hosts’ genuine expertise across the RTS and tactics genre landscape, drawing meaningfully from titles like Company of Heroes, Steel Division, and Battle Sector rather than treating Total War in isolation. The episode leaves listeners with a clear sense of what’s confirmed versus speculative, appropriately hedging its considerable enthusiasm against the franchise’s recent history of rocky launches.
Next Episode: Upcoming Strategy Games We’re Watching in 2026
Discover more from Critical Moves
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


