Four strategy gaming veterans dissect the remaster phenomenon, revealing why most are lazy cash grabs while acknowledging the rare gems that actually respect their source material and player base.
https://criticalmovespodcast.com/listen
This episode examines the fundamental tension between nostalgia-driven remasters and genuine innovation in strategy gaming. The hosts debate whether remasters serve existing communities or exploit them, explore the differences between remasters and remakes, and identify which classic titles deserve modern treatment. The conversation spans technical improvements, emotional connections to childhood games, and the commercial realities driving remaster decisions across major publishers.
Critical Moves Podcast – Episode 1 Show Notes
Episode Title: The Truth About Strategy Game Remasters
Hosts: Nuno, Al, Tim, Joe
Episode Length: 43 minutes
Episode Summary
The inaugural episode of Critical Moves tackles strategy game remasters with characteristic directness. The hosts examine whether these rereleases serve players or publishers, distinguishing between quality-of-life improvements that enhance classic games and superficial cash grabs that exploit nostalgia. The discussion covers successful remasters like Command & Conquer Remastered Collection and Age of Empires II Definitive Edition alongside disappointing efforts like Rome Total War Remastered and Warcraft III Reforged.
Key Topics Discussed
The Remaster Versus Remake Distinction
The hosts establish clear boundaries between remasters (improved versions of original games) and remakes (ground-up reconstructions). Remasters should preserve the original experience while adding modern conveniences. Remakes allow for fundamental changes but risk losing the essence that made originals memorable. This distinction becomes crucial when evaluating whether projects succeed or fail their intended audiences.
Essential Remaster Components
Three core improvements justify remaster existence: enhanced graphics that meet modern standards, updated user interfaces that eliminate outdated design choices, and improved control schemes that accommodate contemporary gaming habits. Control improvements receive particular emphasis, with hosts noting how keyboard camera movement and unit grouping have become standard expectations that older games lack.
The Commercial Reality
Remasters represent low-risk business decisions for publishers. They require minimal investment compared to new intellectual property development while targeting built-in audiences with proven interest. This economic logic explains their proliferation but also their frequent mediocrity. Publishers can profit from remasters that would be considered failures if they were original games.
Community-Driven Development
Several successful remasters built upon existing community projects. Age of Empires II Definitive Edition expanded on Forgotten Empires’ community work, while Command & Conquer Remastered benefited from years of fan modifications. These examples suggest collaboration between official developers and passionate communities produces superior results.
Technical Modernization Challenges
Legacy games often contain fundamental design decisions that clash with modern expectations. Resolution support, control schemes, and interface design all require careful updating. The most successful remasters solve these problems without compromising the original gameplay experience.
Successful Remasters Analyzed
Command & Conquer Remastered Collection
Al champions this release for its intelligent approach to visual upgrades. The ability to toggle between original and remastered graphics demonstrates respect for both nostalgia and modernization. The collection preserves the original gameplay while adding contemporary quality-of-life features. EA’s decision to work with community feedback paid dividends in player satisfaction.
Age of Empires II Definitive Edition
Multiple hosts praise this remaster for supporting an active multiplayer community. The definitive edition built upon the HD Edition’s foundation while adding substantial improvements. New civilizations, campaigns, and enhanced graphics justified the purchase for both returning players and newcomers. The continued tournament scene validates its competitive viability.
Age of Mythology Retold
Joe’s experience playing Retold without prior franchise knowledge offers valuable perspective. The game succeeds as a standalone experience while satisfying series veterans. The campaign’s variety and storytelling remain compelling decades later. However, some visual changes toward cartoon aesthetics divided opinion among longtime fans.
Stronghold Definitive Edition
Nunu emphasizes this remaster’s restraint in preserving original gameplay systems. The developers resisted major mechanical changes while improving graphics and adding content. The medieval castle-building formula remains intact, allowing players to experience familiar gameplay with modern conveniences. Control improvements make the experience more accessible without compromising authenticity.
Notable Failures
Rome Total War Remastered
Al’s disappointment with this remaster illustrates how high expectations can backfire. Despite investing thousands of hours in the original, the remaster felt inferior due to clunky battles and pointless additions like merchants. The emotional connection to the original game made the remaster’s shortcomings more pronounced. Sometimes nostalgia cannot be recaptured through technical improvements alone.
Warcraft III Reforged
The hosts cite this as a cautionary tale about destroying existing communities. Blizzard’s decision to replace the original game with a flawed remaster eliminated player choice while introducing new problems. The multiplayer community suffered as features disappeared and stability decreased. This example demonstrates how remasters can actively harm their intended audience.
Pharaoh Remake
The decision to adopt cartoon graphics for a historically-themed city builder puzzled the hosts. This art direction choice alienated existing fans without clearly targeting new demographics. The remake succeeded technically but failed to understand what made the original appealing to its audience.
Fantasy Remaster Wishlist
Battle for Middle-earth (Joe)
The combination of Peter Jackson’s film aesthetic with large-scale battles would benefit enormously from modern graphics capabilities. The original’s epic moments like Helm’s Deep and the Rohirrim charge could showcase contemporary visual technology while preserving the strategic gameplay that made battles memorable.
Dawn of War (Al)
The Warhammer 40K license’s growing popularity through Henry Cavill’s Amazon collaboration creates perfect timing for a Dawn of War remaster. Relic’s Company of Heroes 3 engine could provide the technical foundation. The original’s base-building RTS formula deserves preservation over the sequels’ failed attempts at innovation.
Total Annihilation: Kingdoms (Tim)
This choice highlights how remasters can salvage good ideas from flawed execution. Kingdoms featured interesting concepts undermined by technical problems and bugs. Modern development tools could realize the original vision properly. The fantasy setting offers unique opportunities within the Total Annihilation framework.
World War II Frontline Command (Nunu)
This obscure selection demonstrates how remasters might rescue forgotten gems from technical obsolescence. The game’s position between arcade RTS and realistic simulation created unique gameplay that current systems cannot run. Sometimes remaster value lies in preservation rather than commercial success.
Industry Analysis
Innovation Versus Nostalgia
The hosts debate whether remasters stifle innovation by providing easy profits from existing properties. Publishers may choose safe remaster projects over risky new intellectual property. However, successful remasters can also prove market demand for strategy gaming, potentially funding future original projects.
Community Preservation
Remasters serve important preservation functions for multiplayer communities. Games like Age of Empires II maintain active player bases decades after release. Remasters provide technical stability and modern compatibility that keeps these communities viable. This function justifies remasters beyond simple commercial motives.
Market Validation
The RTS drought from 2007 until recently coincided with the absence of remaster projects. Recent remaster success helped demonstrate continued audience interest in strategy gaming. This market validation may have encouraged new original strategy game development. Remasters and innovation can coexist rather than compete.
Technical Considerations
Resolution and Interface Scaling
Legacy games designed for 4:3 monitors and low resolutions require extensive interface redesign for modern displays. Simple upscaling produces unusable interfaces. Successful remasters rebuild interfaces while preserving original functionality and layout logic.
Control Scheme Evolution
Gaming conventions have evolved significantly since many classic strategy games were released. WASD camera movement, customizable hotkeys, and mouse wheel zoom have become standard expectations. Remasters must balance preserving original feel with meeting contemporary usability standards.
Engine Limitations
Some improvements require engine-level changes that exceed remaster scope. Physics systems, pathfinding algorithms, and rendering pipelines may need complete reconstruction. Understanding these limitations helps set appropriate expectations for what remasters can accomplish.
Contact & Links
About | Contact | Meet the Team | Get Involved | Forum | Blog
Patreon | Discord | Reddit | Twitter / X | Facebook
Instagram | Twitch | Steam Group | Steam Curator
YouTube | Spotify | Apple | Amazon
Email: [email protected]
Episode Verdict
The hosts conclude that remasters serve legitimate purposes when executed with respect for source material and player communities. The best examples preserve original gameplay while solving technical problems that prevent modern enjoyment. However, the ease of producing mediocre remasters creates market oversaturation with low-quality releases that exploit rather than serve fan interest.
Successful remasters require understanding what made originals special and careful consideration of which elements need updating versus preservation. Community involvement often produces superior results compared to purely commercial projects. The strategy gaming community benefits from thoughtful remasters that maintain classic games’ accessibility while supporting ongoing innovation.
This inaugural episode establishes Critical Moves’ analytical approach to strategy gaming topics. The hosts encourage listener engagement across their community platforms while promising future episodes covering the RTS renaissance and other strategic gaming developments.
Next Episode: The RTS Renaissance: Is Real-Time Strategy Back?
Discover more from Critical Moves Podcast
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.