Episode 22: Burden of Command Interview With Luke Hughes

In Episode 21 of Critical Moves, Al and Nuno sit down with Dr. Luke Hughes, lead designer of Burden of Command, a tactical leadership RPG set during World War II. The conversation explores the game’s long development history, its focus on player-driven storytelling, and how it blends psychology, history, and strategy into a distinct tactical experience.

Leadership Under Fire

Burden of Command puts you in the boots of a captain in the 7th Infantry Regiment – the “Cottonbalers” – starting with basic training before moving to Operation Torch in North Africa. Unlike traditional top-down wargames, the emphasis here is on leading people, not just moving units. Your officers have values, doubts, and loyalties. Every decision affects relationships, cohesion, and morale.

Luke talks about the emotional cost of leadership. You’ll deal with internal conflicts, manage the trust of your team, and face hard choices under pressure. The game rewards decisiveness, but it also reflects consequences, both tactical and personal. Success depends on more than good positioning or smart tactics. It hinges on how you lead.

A Decade in Development

The interview covers the game’s lengthy development cycle. Luke explains how the core concept – blending tactical gameplay with branching narrative – never changed, even though the systems around it evolved significantly. At times, he says, it felt closer to a research project than a commercial product, but the team stayed committed to exploring the human side of war.

He credits military historians, veteran consultants, and advice from figures like Jon Schafer (Civilization V) for helping shape the game’s design. Authenticity wasn’t about realism for its own sake, but about grounding the emotional experience in something believable. Playtesting focused as much on how players felt as on how they performed.

Player Agency Through Writing

Al and Nuno ask how the writing supports the gameplay. Luke describes it as a constant clash of values – pushing forward aggressively might damage morale, while protecting your officers could undermine discipline. The choices don’t have obvious “good” or “bad” outcomes. Instead, they reflect the kind of leader you want to be.

Your decisions shape more than dialogue. They impact officer loyalty, mission effectiveness, and unit cohesion. The game isn’t about winning the right way. It’s about understanding what your choices cost.

Strategy Games With Heart

Al notes how rare it is to see a strategy game invest this deeply in emotion and character. Luke explains that too many war games treat soldiers as disposable. Burden of Command was built to push back against that trend. It still includes core tactical mechanics like suppression, flanking, and morale systems, but its foundation is the human bond between leader and team.

The episode wraps with a discussion about indie development, scope, and risk. Luke outlines how the team kept things lean by working in Unity and staying focused on narrative depth over scale. Al and Nuno both praise the direction of the project, calling it one of the most thoughtful games in the strategy space.

Final Thoughts

Burden of Command is shaping up to be something rare: a tactical game that asks you to lead with integrity, not just skill. Your decisions matter because people depend on you – not just for victory, but for survival.

Listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, or search your alternative preferred podcast provider.

Ahh, we’re on YouTube too!